Sunday, September 9, 2012

Overly Judgmental Advice for Jazz Singers

I've been playing piano and organ for singers quite a bit lately. I feel moved to write some advice to singers who might want to avoid putting both my and their musical weaknesses more on display than necessary. My advice is particularly aimed at a jam-session context where the people making the music often don't have much experience playing together.

Step back for a second and think about the miracle you are trying to create when you perform a song with people who might never have played with you before, might never have played with each other before, and might never have heard your tune before. When things go well the miracle comes true, and this newly assembled group of people can join forces with you to create a genuinely beautiful public performance with no rehearsal. It's amazing, stunning that it ever works at all, really. So realize it's a fragile thing that must be nurtured and cultivated. Be willing to prepare in service of that cultivation.

A great rhythm section with players who know all the tunes ever written (and there are some rhythm sections like this!) will not need your help and will stand a good chance of making you sound great if you can just come in at the right time and in the right key. But much more common are rhythm sections made up of musicians like me who only know a few hundred to a few thousand tunes, and are more comfortable with most of them in some keys than in others.

Even we players with skills that don't always measure up have worked hard getting to the point where the miracle is within reach. We have studied music theory. We understand rhythm. We have trained our ears and brains to hear what the music is doing, and we have trained our bodies to create on our instruments the tones we hear in our minds. We have spent countless hours practicing, studying, listening, attending classes, and taking lessons. Many of us have focused our lives for years at a time on the development of skill in music performance.

Most singers appreciate all this and do not need to be reminded. Some have made similar commitments in service of their vocal craft. But there are also the uninformed few who sang a night of karaoke a few months ago and were told by a drunk, horny person hoping to pick them up that they sounded nice, so now they feel ready to front the band and collect the glory without really knowing the first thing about what they are doing. It is unreasonable to expect everything to go smoothly if you haven't worked at the music a bit.

Very often you will be asking a rhythm section made up of people like me to play a song in public for the first time when we have never heard the song before. If you do the right preparation, the miracle of beautiful music in that situation is possible. A few basic steps can really help a lot. Some steps can be left out some of the time and things might still go OK. But the more you omit, the more you are tempting fate.

Another benefit of preparation is that it puts your relationship with the band on a good footing. It shows that you understand your job as a singer and their job as a rhythm section supporting you. It shows your professionalism and earns you respect.

So here are some specific things you can do to prepare for that time when you drop a chart in front of players you just met, count off the tune, and knock the socks off your audience.

  1. Listen to music a lot. Listen to jazz. Not just vocal jazz, but real, instrumental jazz. Learn to identify where you are in the tune. Learn what different kinds of introductions and transitions sound like. Learn to count beats and count bars. Do all these things with music that challenges you and makes you work at it.
  2. Learn at least some music theory. The more the better.
  3. Learn solfège, i.e., train your ears well enough that you can sight-read music without an instrument in front of you. You might have a nice voice, but you are not really a singer if you can't do this at a basic level.
  4. Understand time and tempo. Learn how to count to four, eight, or even higher at a steady speed. Understand that the band is going to play your tune at the speed you count, so you need to be able to hear the tune in your head at the speed you want, and then count at that speed.
  5. Learn the names of a few feels that apply to common tunes. It will help you a lot to be able to use words like Latin, Bossa, Swing, Shuffle, Two-feel, Samba, Walking Bass, Rubato, Clave, Straight Eighths, and so on. The vocabulary goes really deep. I was rightly scorned on a gig because the drummer used the term "Partido Alto" and I didn't know what it meant. There is always more to learn, so get started now if you haven't already. These terms are not just in-group jargon; they're ways of communicating complicated ideas quickly on the spot.
  6. Choose keys that are comfortable for you, but also consider that standard keys are better than bizarre ones. If your voice fits "On Green Dolphin Street" in E major, think about the fact that the tune is usually played in E-flat major and maybe you could simplify things for everyone by choosing the nearby standard key. It's one less thing to go wrong.
  7. Also on the subject of keys, it's handy to know that because of the way it has evolved around horns, jazz leans much more toward the flat keys than the sharp keys. There are a few standards normally played in sharp keys, but not many, and not too deeply into the sharp keys. Going deeply into the flat keys, by contrast, is much more usual. So all else being equal, a chart in a flat key is probably easier for your band to read and play than a chart with the same number of sharps. All music students learn that we should be equally comfortable in all twelve keys on every tune. Very, very few of us come anywhere near achieving that goal. Let your choice of keys live in the real world of musicians who actually exist.
  8. Know what makes a good lead sheet and try to have a good one. A good lead sheet:
    1. Is written in the key you want to perform the song in.
    2. Fits on one page if practical.
    3. Reflects the harmony you actually want to use for your performance. If you find a tune in a cheesy fake book somewhere, keep in mind that its changes might not match the super hip changes on the record you are singing along with to practice. If you want the hip changes for your performance, get them on paper for the band. If you have never even heard the changes on your lead sheet before you hit the bandstand, you're going to have a bad time.
    4. Includes all the parts of the song that you intend to do, including introduction, verse, chorus, and ending, if applicable. As I said above, some of these steps can be skipped sometimes. A good rhythm section can make up a credible introduction or ending to most standard tunes on the spot, for example. But the results are often better if this isn't left to chance, particularly if there's a particular progression you're used to hearing so you know where and how to enter.
    5. Is clearly written or printed, with good contrast, in a clear font of sufficient size, and without major printing blunders. A singer recently gave me a lead sheet where many of the chord symbols had the tune's lyrics printed over them.
      Remember that the people reading your lead sheet will probably be facing bright stage lights and might not have realized they would need those little lights that clip on their music stands.
    6. Contains clear guides to the form of the tune, such as heavy bar lines between sections, and is free of confusing errors. A singer handed me a chart that was missing two bars from one section. The bassist knew the tune so he played those two bars when the time came, even though they weren't on the chart. The drummer and I didn't play them because we didn't know the tune. Carnage ensued on the bandstand. Another chart had a heavy bar line one bar away from where it should have been, causing me and the bassist to get confused about the form at different times. Carnage again. Better players would not be thrown by these errors, granted. But don't you want to maximize your chances of success?
    7. Uses standard notation. I was recently given a chart where half-diminished chords were written as "C-7b5" which is fine except that the lower-case 'b' doing double duty as a "flat" symbol was printed in a small-caps font, so it looked like "C-7B5."
      Nonsense! (Also notice that the lyrics are printed over a note head in that example!) It can be deciphered, but it's unnecessary cognitive load on the person trying to sight-read your lead sheet. Don't do that. Similarly, there is some music software out there (Sibelius, maybe?) creating lead sheets where the 'm' that's supposed to signify a minor chord looks like an upper-case 'M.' Upper-case 'M' normally means major. So it is always extra work to realize that "CM7" on such a sheet actually refers to a minor chord. Avoid software like this.
    8. Contains cues allowing the rhythm section to understand where you think you are in the tune. Cues can be short landmark phrases from the lyrics, a written-out melody or portions of the melody, or whatever. Just something that allows the band to know whether everyone is in the same place, or even performing the same song. A singer recently handed me a lyrics-free chart for an unfamiliar tune. She has a gorgeous voice and a very strong interpretive element in her singing. She performed beautifully, but her interpretation of the melody was so far from what was on the chart that many questioning glances flew between me and the other instrumentalists. The bassist and I knew we were together, but we didn't have any idea whether the singer was with us or on some other planet. It turned out everything was fine, but a few lyric cues on the chart would have made things more comfortable.
There are surely many more ways singers can make impromptu collaboration with a rhythm section go smoothly. In the end there's no substitute for having the unassailable musical sense of an Ella Fitzgerald or a Kurt Elling. And if your rhythm section is led by Paul Smith or Laurence Hobgood you're off to an impeccable start, too. But most of us have a lot of work to do before we're in those leagues. I hope the tips above will help someone use their time more effectively and get more out of pick-up performances.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Blog Names

My blog sure has a silly name. I couldn't think of a better one.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Why would I get married?

An apropos comic from 1963, about a month and a half before my parents married

After objecting in principle to marriage for a long time, I had a shift in perspective a while back and decided it would be a good idea to marry my then-sweetheart-now-wife Linda. How did this happen?

Lots of people have asked and I've answered lots of different ways as I've explored my thoughts on the subject and experimented with how to explain them. Yesterday I thought of what seemed like the best, clearest explanation yet, but now the idea feels hard to explain again. I'll give it a shot anyway, starting with some background on my objections.

One of the things I've always objected to about marriage is that it's accorded a legitimacy not granted to other ways of being an intimate partner in someone's life. The history of marriage as a property transaction between a man and the father of a woman, the history of marriage as a religious institution, the default interpretation of marriage as a monogamous union, the attachment of legal status to marriage and the attendant government interference in one's private life, and the widespread restriction of marriage to heterosexual couples all deeply undermine its legitimacy as an institution and its attractiveness to me. I didn't and still don't want any part in supporting those things even though I grew willing to get married. On top of that, marriage can have negative tax consequences.

Then there's another layer of trouble when you get married: People expect a certain order of things. A ceremony. A party. Things that involve lots of planning and work and money.

So with those compelling arguments against marriage, how could I decide to do it? It's hard to explain but the more Linda and I talked about it, the more it seemed like fun and the more my objections seemed to recede into the background of my feelings about it. Worries over the legal consequences should we ever split up just never seemed to materialize for me, and the process of organizing a big party that we kick off by telling a hundred or more of our best friends how much we love each other started to seem like fun more than work.

Here are some of the advantages that make a difference to me. They do nothing to answer my objections (indeed many of them *are* my objections inasmuch as unmarried couples don't get them), but I guess by now I've done my part to prove marriage isn't necessary for strong relationships, nor for difficult breakups. It still bums me out that it's so much harder for unmarried couples (including gay couples) to get these things, but I guess I decided somehow it's OK for me to enjoy them as the fruits of marriage:

Marriage gets legal recognition for our roles in each other's lives. Even though these benefits are mostly available through private contracts, etc., Linda and I weren't doing the work to put those things in place, and the risk of needing to make life-or-death decisions on each other's behalf but not being allowed to has bugged us for a long time.

Marriage gets social recognition and makes our relationship easier for others to understand (or at least think they understand). When I tell someone Linda is my girlfriend or partner or co-mortgagee or lover, many people don't know what to make of it. Most are polite, but feel those words raise unanswered questions. That's fine -- people need to live more comfortably with ambiguity anyway. But it's more comfortable (and fewer syllables) to just say "wife." Even though that word leaves a lot of questions unanswered, too, most people don't even realize it and feel satisfied with their assumptions about what that word means. And of course some of their assumptions are true in our case.

It gets business recognition: Linda will be able to get better health insurance more cheaply through my plan at work than she has now.

Marriage means something to Linda that other ways of being a couple apparently don't. We've only been married two days so there's more to learn here, but I think it will make pooling our money easier for her. She didn't want to buy nor wear our gorgeous wedding rings unless we were actually married. And I think we're both looking forward to simpler accounting now that our most of our income is community property.

In the end it could be that much as I don't want it to, marriage means something to me, too, that other ways of being a couple don't. How else could it be that with the right bride, the all-too-real problems with the institution just don't seem to matter much at all?

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Blog ideas, thoughts on discipline and tenacity

I could critique a song or album every day (this is Linda's idea for a blog, so maybe I won't steal it but I hope she'll do it; maybe she and I should do it together but I bet she won't go for that).

I could discuss music I'm working on and my daily journey toward better playing. This would be broad, including what I learn about instruments in general and piano tuning in particular.

I could discuss books I've read recently.

I wonder whether I have the tenacity and am willing to make the time to write about anything on a regular basis. I get so busy doing things and trying to do them better that I doubt I can make myself a lot time to write about anything.

I'm writing this on an oldish laptop that I bought in 2003. For a laptop, that's old. But I think it still has a lot of useful life left in it. It's a Mac G4 powerbook (aluminum) running OS 10.3.8, one version before Apple killed Classic and went to support for universal binaries. I still occasionally use some Classic apps like sonicWORX PowerBundle (which incidentally has a really nice multiband compressor). I also use a few Pro Tools plug-ins that I haven't upgraded to version 7.3.x (which I run on my iMac), and to be able to use those plug-ins I need version 6.4 which runs on my laptop. I'm not sure 6.4 will run under 10.3.9 or later so I don't upgrade.

I raced motorcycles for nine years.

I started playing piano when I was six and I still play quite a bit.

I started learning to tune pianos in 1986 when I got so frustrated with the horrible basement piano in a dorm where I was staying that I knew nothing I could do to it would make it worse. I was right -- I didn't make it worse -- but tuning turned out to be a lot more complicated than I expected it to be. By now I've gotten pretty good at it (though I'm slow) but it wasn't as simple as I thought it might be.

I like photography and I used to do it a lot but I'm not very good at it these days. The bar's been raised quite a bit by ubiquitous digital cameras.

Yesterday was my brother's birthday. He turned 42. I'm almost two years older than he is; my birthday is in about a month.

Music I've been stealing lately: "Solid Jack" as played by Larry Goldings on his Sweet Science album. "Sonoma Slide" as played by Richard Dworsky on PHC a couple of weeks ago. Both those guys have very distinctive playing styles and although they focus on genres where I play, too, almost their entire vocabularies are disjoint from mine when it comes to improvisation. I learn a ton when I copy their solos.